# SeaweedFS vs Ticky

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Ticky |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #14 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 799 ✓ | 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +838 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.15.2 · 2 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 50/100 for Ticky, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Ticky.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Ticky](https://selfhost.directory/project/ticky) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ticky.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-ticky