# SeaweedFS vs Thumbor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Thumbor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 35 799 ✓ | 10 528 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +838 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 7.8.0 · 30 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 72/100 for Thumbor, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Thumbor.

If you want the quickest setup, Thumbor is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Thumbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/thumbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/thumbor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-thumbor