# SeaweedFS vs Teleport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Teleport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 35 793 ✓ | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +868 ✓ | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Teleport](https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-teleport