# SeaweedFS vs TelegramRSS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | TelegramRSS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 35 801 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +840 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.5.0 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 47/100 for TelegramRSS, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for TelegramRSS.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; TelegramRSS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [TelegramRSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/telegramrss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/telegramrss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-telegramrss