SeaweedFSvsTdarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Tdarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 35 799 | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +838 | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Makefile |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Tdarr details →