SeaweedFSvsTaskwarrior
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Taskwarrior | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 15 in Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 35 801 | 6 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +840 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 1 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 68/100 for Taskwarrior, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Taskwarrior.
If you want the quickest setup, Taskwarrior is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Taskwarrior details →