# SeaweedFS vs Taskosaur

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Taskosaur |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #37 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 801 ✓ | 575 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +840 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.1.2 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 42/100 for Taskosaur, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Taskosaur.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Taskosaur](https://selfhost.directory/project/taskosaur) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/taskosaur.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-taskosaur