# SeaweedFS vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 35 799 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +838 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-syncwatch