SeaweedFSvsswarm-cronjob
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | swarm-cronjob | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 35 795 | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +834 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 3 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for swarm-cronjob.
If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →swarm-cronjob details →