SeaweedFSvsSSH & Web Terminal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | SSH & Web Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 19 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for SSH & Web Terminal.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →SSH & Web Terminal details →