# SeaweedFS vs sonobarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | sonobarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #16 of 31 in Music |
| GitHub stars | 35 801 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +840 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.13.0 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 48/100 for sonobarr, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for sonobarr.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [sonobarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonobarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonobarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-sonobarr