# SearXNG vs Trinity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SearXNG | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 984 ✓ | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 372 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.

Trinity ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 372 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)
- [Trinity](https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/searxng-vs-trinity