SearXNGvsTidal Echo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SearXNG | Tidal Echo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #61 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 38 976 | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 364 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 47/100 for Tidal Echo, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; Tidal Echo needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 364 stars in 30 days).
SearXNG details →Tidal Echo details →
Swap a project
Keep SearXNG, compare it with
Keep Tidal Echo, compare it with