# SearXNG vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SearXNG | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 994 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 382 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.7.25 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

subarr ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 382 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/searxng-vs-subarr