# SearXNG vs speech-to-phrase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SearXNG | speech-to-phrase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 38 977 ✓ | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 365 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

speech-to-phrase ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 365 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)
- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/searxng-vs-speech-to-phrase