sdnextvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with