sdnextvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with