sdnextvsValhalla
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Valhalla | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #1 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 6 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +134 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext and Valhalla score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Valhalla ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Valhalla needs more configuration.
Valhalla is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Valhalla details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Valhalla, compare it with