sdnextvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with