# sdnext vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sdnext | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 39 757 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +776 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sdnext-vs-umami