# sdnext vs UglyFeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sdnext | UglyFeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 ✓ | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

UglyFeed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)
- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sdnext-vs-uglyfeed