sdnextvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with