# sdnext vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sdnext | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

## Details

- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sdnext-vs-transfersh