# sdnext vs Tdarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sdnext | Tdarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 ✓ | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +37 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Makefile |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

Tdarr is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)
- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sdnext-vs-tdarr