sdnextvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with