# sdnext vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sdnext | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 11 122 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +100 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext and SonarQube score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

SonarQube is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sdnext-vs-sonarqube