sdnextvsSignal TLS Proxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Signal TLS Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #16 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 1 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Signal TLS Proxy details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Signal TLS Proxy, compare it with