sdnextvsShiny Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Shiny Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 763 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 57/100 for Shiny Server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Shiny Server needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Shiny Server details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Shiny Server, compare it with