Scryptedvswho-rang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scrypted | who-rang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #78 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 6 027 | 227 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.147.0 · 13 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Scrypted scores 61/100 against 47/100 for who-rang, so it is the safer default.
Scrypted ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for who-rang.
If you want the quickest setup, Scrypted is easier to run; who-rang needs more configuration.
Scrypted is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
Scrypted details →who-rang details →