# ScreenTinker vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ScreenTinker | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 242 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.18.27 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; ScreenTinker needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/screentinker-vs-wbo