# screenlite vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | screenlite | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in Digital Signage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 363 | 114 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 530 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 42/100 for screenlite, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for screenlite.

If you want the quickest setup, screenlite is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [screenlite](https://selfhost.directory/project/screenlite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screenlite.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/screenlite-vs-supabase