# scanopy vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | scanopy | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Network | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 915 | 89 732 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 | +2 393 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, scanopy is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 393 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scanopy-vs-world-monitor