# scanopy vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | scanopy | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Network | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 5 915 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

scanopy scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, scanopy is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

scanopy is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scanopy-vs-windows-arm