scalarvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| scalar | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 13 in API | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 16 335 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +156 | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 46 | 11 |
| Latest release | release-2026-10-28-0d01943 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for scalar, so it is the safer default.
scalar ships more often: 46 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, scalar is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
scalar details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep scalar, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with