# Scada-LTS vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 53 715 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +330 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+330 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-windowsindocker