# Scada-LTS vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-wbo