# Scada-LTS vs Viseron

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Viseron |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 3 670 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 17 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Viseron scores 70/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Viseron ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

Viseron is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Viseron](https://selfhost.directory/project/viseron) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/viseron.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-viseron