# Scada-LTS vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-urbit