# Scada-LTS vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 17 183 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-upptime