# Scada-LTS vs Unison

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Unison |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 5 559 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +65 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | OCaml |

## Which one should you pick?

Unison scores 65/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Unison ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

Unison is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Unison](https://selfhost.directory/project/unison) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unison.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-unison