# Scada-LTS vs Typebot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Typebot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 10 587 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +223 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Typebot scores 70/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Typebot ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Typebot](https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-typebot