# Scada-LTS vs tidb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | tidb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 40 685 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

tidb ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.

tidb is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-tidb