# Scada-LTS vs Telegraf

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Telegraf |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 17 886 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +55 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Telegraf scores 78/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

Telegraf is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Telegraf](https://selfhost.directory/project/telegraf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/telegraf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-telegraf