# Scada-LTS vs Superset

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Superset |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 75 350 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +449 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Superset scores 88/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Superset ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.

Superset is growing faster right now (+449 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Superset](https://selfhost.directory/project/superset) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/superset.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-superset