# Scada-LTS vs SketchForge

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | SketchForge |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 1 176 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Scada-LTS and SketchForge score the same (55/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

SketchForge ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [SketchForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/sketchforge-3d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sketchforge-3d.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-sketchforge-3d