# Scada-LTS vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-shinobi