# Scada-LTS vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Scada-LTS | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 38 956 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 390 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/scada-lts-vs-searxng