# satisfactory vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | satisfactory | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 62 in Game Servers | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 2 078 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.11 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

satisfactory scores 62/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for satisfactory.

If you want the quickest setup, satisfactory is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

satisfactory is growing faster right now (+15 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [satisfactory](https://selfhost.directory/project/satisfactory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/satisfactory.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/satisfactory-vs-windows-arm