sapphirevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sapphire | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #34 of 120 in AI Assistant | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 321 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.13.1 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 51/100 for sapphire, so it is the safer default.
sapphire ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
sapphire details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep sapphire, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with