# Sandstorm vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sandstorm | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Web Hosting | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 7 078 | 118 130 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +5 771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Sandstorm, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Sandstorm.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sandstorm](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandstorm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandstorm.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandstorm-vs-tradingagents